Quote:
Originally Posted by simonandhallie 
If you don't like PETA or the Humane Society I really could care less, the point of the article is about euthanasia and if you want to argue that ANY of those dogs would have been better off living with those injuries.......bring it!
|
OK...here it is
. If the numbers are correct, I can't see how anyone can justify that much killing. It truly is beyond me how, even considering the 'worst of the worst', that only 7 out of over 2,000 dogs could have been saved. Maybe PETA can justify a higher than average kill rate, but to save only 7 out of over 2,000?? I was just kidding about the arguing but I just can't imagine any scenario where such a high kill rate is justified. I will keep an open mind if you can explain this.