View Single Post
Old 03-29-2009, 09:17 AM   #168
Carsons Mommy
Mom 2 Carson & Bailey
Donating Member
 
Carsons Mommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ft. Mitchell, KY
Posts: 1,122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Borinal View Post
SURE.

Statements from Breeder do NOT match the timestamps on the picture.

Dog in pictures is CLEARLY not the dog received, and if it is of the dog at a MUCH EARLY date, it is STILL mis-represented.

The dogs weight, the conversations regarding the disposition of the dog.

PROVEN.

In FL also the burden of proof lies on the breeder, not the adoptive home.

The dog that we we're provided pictures of is not even the same color, is not even close to the same weight. She is not what we we're adopting.

Also, ironically enough on the further inspection of the vet records the dogs listed name is "Pixie" AND the dog DOES NOT answer to Emma.
You DO realize that pictures have incorrect timestamps on them ALL the time. The camera could have never had the date set or had the wrong date set. I know I have TONS of pictures with timestamps on them that are off by months or years. So that proves nothing.
Carsons Mommy is offline  
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!