Quote:
Originally Posted by Missiemiss  Bottom line - you signed the contract that you both agreed to. At that time you signed it you understood (assumption) all of the possibilities.
It could be genetic
It could have been trauma
If the contract says that you have the burden of proof on you then get to work to get it. Otherwise, you were of sound mind when you signed that contract. No one forced your hand or held a gun.
This is about accountability. In the mean time - love that baby up! Your baby deserves that!
We don't need to drag people (yet ANOTHER thread) through the slanderous activity. Get your facts and present them to Breny. You honor your side of the contract, she honors hers. Leave the slams, name-calling and other stuff out of this forum. It's childish. I know it is very emotional for you but keep to the facts. |
Very well said. The facts are not being fairly presented here...and I for one think it should not be allowed to continue.
It is my understanding (please correct me if I am wrong OP) that he does not live with the dog, nor does he live in the same state as the dog. He purchased the dog and then gave it to a relative as a gift.
Nothing wrong with that. However, NOT one bit of info from the relative who actually owns and lives with the puppy...nor the vet diagnosing and treating the puppy has been sent to Brenda thus far. No xrays, no official diagnosis...nothing. Just his word that it is so.
As the above quoted poster said...start sending her facts. She needs to talk personally with the vet's treating the puppy and see if they believe this was indeed inherited or if there are signs of any old or new trauma that could have caused this. Only then can the breeder make a sound decision on what she may be liable for.