Quote:
Originally Posted by Karrie  I don't usually post to these types of threads, but I feel that I must respond to that article.
I understand that there are responsible breeders and that there are irresponsible breeders. I understand that some breeders are greeders and some breeders breed for their love of the breed and for the best interest in producing quality and healthy dogs.
I just read the AKC standard - and it makes reference to only physical appearance!! I TOTALLY disagree with the continuous comment in that article that if someone does not have a dog meets the 100% physical appearance as set forth by the AKC then they do not have the right to breed it!!
I strongly oppose irresponsible breeders who breed for greed without any consideration to the puppy's health - but I also disagree with the idea that only a select few should have the right to breed. My baby is AKC certified - but does not meet the AKC standard - she has silver on her forehead!! She is healthy, smart and 100% yorkie. I can't imagine life without her and she came from a responsible BYB.
It is wrong to label all BYBers as irresponsible and careless. These types of posts are offensive to me- and I don't think I'm the only one. |
i don't think the OP or anyone was 'labeling' all bybers irresponsible and careless. there are always exceptions...just in general, they have not done as much research as needed, but i don't think the thread is about saying that all bybers are irresponsible. (although most probably are.) it is about raising awareness, since people are NOT aware.