Quote:
Originally Posted by MindieRose  No one is comparing yorkies to jews, they are comparing the set standard to the standards that hitler set. I am very much a jewish and Israel supporter and I find nothing offensive about using hitler as an example. Its the fact that someone is, or a group of people are saying that something is not worthy of breeding if it doesnt fit a certain physical standard. Nothing outside of what a certain group says is accepted as far as hair color. It's nothing that even effects the health of the animal (yeah yeah "as far as you know" but there are a billion standard yorkies out there with many devestating genetic faults), but rather what color their hair is. |
Just wanted to quote myself to see if there was an answer to my question.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amber_lv But every breed has it's own set standard right?? i mean you don't see any rotwilers(sp) being bred to have white and red markings they are bred to have black and tan markings it is what makes them distingishable from a black lab or a poodle right?
I don't have a problem with you or anyone who wants to breed the off colors i for one DO like the party look in any breed but all i was saying is it isn't the standard like stated above if you seen a red and white Rotty you wouldn't know it was a rotty.
The thing i respect about the Biewers is that they recognize that the color is not a yorkie standard although they came from yorkies they are not called yorkies they don't want to be added as a sub group to the yorkies they want their own name and standard. Why should this be different from the other colors??? if you want to breed them call them Golden Terriers, Chocolate Terriers, Purple People Eaters (LOL)  etc??? |