Thread: Mill argument
View Single Post
Old 08-28-2005, 04:56 PM   #74
sabrinasmom
YT 500 Club Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: texas
Posts: 769
Default

I think a lot of us are uneasy talking about puppy mills because the definitions are so erratic. Some people have dogs to make money. I don't have a problem with that because some people raise cats, cows, emus etc. to make money. I have a problem with anyone who raises animals and doesn't clean their living quarters, feed them, vet them, water them etc. properly. I may treat my pup like a child (I do) but I don't expect this of everyone, I do expect people I deal with to treat their animals decently, whatever that animal is. I abhor the things I've seen on Opra or 60 minutes, even our local news with starving, mistreated horses and dogs. I'd turn someone in for it - but it's animal abuse, short and simple. That is something I think most people could agree on, and if that was the definition used to fight for animals, instead of their making money, over breeding their dogs, etc., I think you would find more people willing to agree to that.

I wish more of these groups could start out on a more common basis and maybe, just maybe, more people would support the efforts of good people trying to make a difference.

Okay - that's it - my $.01 worth, and off my chest.
sabrinasmom is offline  
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!