Quote:
Originally Posted by Pruett  When 100 random dogs tested in the mutt test were scattered all over the board, and ours form a nice neat little cluster, that told us that we had a very distinct breed, not a mutt and not a Yorkshire Terrier. |
Does that mean that the other suggested breeds that were found were present in each and every dog tested, or did it vary? Or were the results within the cluster slightly varied, but w/ a common link (Yorkie?) (I.e. 20 dogs tested showed Saluki and Malteese, 20 showed Malteese only, 20 showed some other combo, etc.) Kind of hard to put my question into words....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pruett I have posted the genetic make up of the Yorkie and everybody that knows Yokies, knows there is no piebald (sp) gene in the Yorkie, thus something else introduced. |
The I would assume that means the same apply for the 'parti Yorkies' we are seeing --that they cannot possibly be 100% Yorkie but that some other breed had to have been introduced somewhere generations back?
All theoretically speaking...