[Pruett]

Originally Posted by Snow Yorkies

I will address your post even though it has nothing to do with the original OP thread. If I felt that I had something that pertains to this thread if it was addressing the piebald gene I would do so. Again that is not what this thread is about. Nor would I have posted here but for some reason you chose to include me in something that had nothing to do with the subject at hand.

Sue I wasn't asking you to talk about the piebald gene, I was clearly using that as an example that you never answer any questions although, you proclaim to be all about educating the public. You once again have shown up to educate, being severely unprepared.

My reference to what I posted did however address some of the questions being asked and since this thread was about the particular puppy Bremen, I answered them. I did not call anyone names such as Guru and not sure why the topic went off to a different dog that this breeder is/or has sold. The thread is about Bremen.

Do you know what a Guru is? I told you to go talk to a Guru. Would you like me to explain what a Guru is?

It is implied that I sold Myrna a puppy. I did not. I did however receive a couple of emails from Myrna as my dog was the sire and when I replied tried to show a little respect by using "Mrs." in my email and from there you both felt it was funny to refer to yet another "Mrs.", sorry but I will not entertain such behavior in adults. Are you not a "Mrs." last I knew you where married.

I referenced Myrna, because she asked you numerous times for information about Homers progeny. I know Myrna never bought a dog from you, so you know I was not implying that she did. Mrs. has nothing to do with your rudeness to Myrna, and unwillingness to share anything about the big galoot's that Homer has being producing, among other problems.

If you are referring to one puppy I sold to a home as a pet with an option to breed, IF the puppy developed and IF that buyer decided to breed, yes I sold this puppy. I deducted a 1000.00 dollars to this purchaser and since I didn't have the normal contract with me and I wrote one on the fly, big mistake, but lesson learned. This person was a 30+ breeder, so she knew the risks and that is why the contract was written the way it was "AS IS".

You have an excuse for everything, even though any person with any intelligence can see right through them.
"AS IS" I guess with your almost 4 years of breeding experience, you have seen it a lot.

I have sold the total of 7 puppies into breeding homes, in the past 4 years. The rest of them have gone as pets. Two of which I regret to this day. Again, lesson learned and I haven't repeated that mistake. The rest that I have felt were breeding/show quality have stayed with me as I have been showing and watching their development.

What's this got to do with Bremen?

I was in CA and I did hear your offer. . It was a emotional weekend for the buyer of these puppies. She had to go through the comments of the judges that weekend and one judge scolded her over the sun burnt coat of the male she had in the ring. Wanda took this very personally as she had just gotten that male with in a couple of months and tried to point out the growth of coat since she had him that it was not burnt in that new growth. They had pointed out that Quendy's bite was off. I guess Wanda was suppose to at that very moment give you an answer, to give up the puppies that she and her family grew very attached to and were now a big part of their family. I know as I have been to Wanda's home on two occasions and have witnessed this. Sorry but that type of decision is a little harder for some, not to discard their dogs, like one would an old shoe. I will apologize for that, as I feel that a person should be granted time to make a emotional decision as such.

OH, so you're admitting to least one of the lies in last post? "never once has Wanda been offered a refund, even having handled Bremen at a FL show". I don't believed I handled the dog. Here we go with excuses. The only reason she didn't want to give them back is because she wouldn't be able to breed right away. Breeding her dogs on the first heat shows her real care and concern for these babies.

Interpretation of this lawsuit can be also that Wanda still has her Biewers. That she did not have to spay/neuter them, nor pay you the additional 1500.00 that was brought forward in this case. Her counter claim was not awarded.

You don't need an interpreter my dear, it was written in black and white. The judge knew nothing about Internet law and dismissed the case. Since you were there and I obviously didn't see you, will you show me where I ask for any money. Money is not what I was after. Unlike some people, I don't have money problems. Once again making up things as you go and talking about something you know nothing about.

I do know that a sire/dam pairing can produce a litter that doesn't work out. I also know when a repeated pairing can produce a different litter than the first. I have placed pets that have grown into beautiful biewers when they were given time to develop and grow.

Good point and another reason not to sell dogs as breeders or show potential before 6 months.

Why you are here and not Wanda is beyond me, unless you are making a last ditch attempt to keep your membership from dwindling.