View Single Post
Old 08-15-2005, 05:59 AM   #90
yorkiegold
BANNED!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalyorkiLvr
Not everyone agrees with the same "standard". The AKC or YTCA "standard" is not the pet yorkie or companion yorkie fancier's "standard". We care more about temperament and personality than outward appearance. We sometimes like floppy ears and short snouts and smaller than the YTCA standard, etc.

There is nothing wrong with a companion dog "standard" being different from a "show dog" standard.

The yorkie is not going anywhere so the argument that hobbyists will "hurt" the breed is really not a valid one unless the show breeders stop breeding.
Here's another one that's been sticking in my craw. "We care more about temperament..."????????????????

We used to breed/train/show Rotts. We got their hips x-rayed and OFA'd, elbows certified, eyes certified by a board-certified specialist, etc. 25 years later, health experts in the field were saying - to hell with the eyes, hips, etc. TEMPERAMENT IS MOST IMPORTANT.

And they were right. I hope it's obvious to all readers why.

What is it about the Yorkie temperament that concerns you and that you think could be improved by pet breeders? If you look at the breed in its entirety, wouldn't you think that health issues such as liver shunt, Legg-Perthes, luxating patella, etc would be at the top of the list and not temperament? The Yorkie gene pool is ENORMOUS and there is no need/excuse to breed any individual with an obvious genetic disqualifying fault.

I know you pride yourself on your logical argument, but your derive your logic from flawed premises and assumptions.

Again, I hope you will cease encouraging unethical breeding practices whether the goal is the show ring or pet home.

CJ
yorkiegold is offline  
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!