Coming from "The Business Law School Chick"
No.. I don't need to study farther. You both have interpreted the contract in two TOTALLY different ways. Therefore the contract is void based on that alone. Clear and Definite Terms is the kicker (which there wasn't). You sold Lola and that is that..
And the whole bit about her wanting Lola after just buying a puppy.. GUESS WHAT! I have 2 little girls (sisters) who are puppies and I'm in the market for a parti yorkie or a biewer!! And when I find the right one, I'll bring him/her home. She has apparently loved Lola when she was available before but got a little boy obviously never thinking she'd get Lola..
Also... I don't compare myself to Paris Hilton when I carry my girls in a bag.. It's convenient! My yorkies are my children and have more than most kids do! So they're not just a "possession" to me.. I think you've got that twisted...
Rachel.. Please, please, please do whatever it takes to keep Lola with you... I'd be heart broken if she left your home.. |