Quote:
Originally Posted by mistyinca  I think a lot of this may be being blown out of proportion. Did anyone read this part of that article?
"But two veterinarians who saw the lab’s test results disagree. They said the levels of lead and other toxins found in the pet toys should not raise a toxicity concern for dogs and cats.
Dr. Mike Murphy of the University of Minnesota’s College of Veterinary Medicine, who holds a Ph.D. in toxicology, said: “Latex paint can contain one-half to one percent of lead, which is 10,000 parts per million. What he (Dr. Lykissa) is saying is that one part per million is a risk. But latex paint is 10,000 times higher than that and we don’t recognize latex paint as a toxicity risk to dogs and cats. I consider these to be extremely low numbers and they are not a toxicological concern for pet owners.” "
and earlier in the article, it said:
"A dog chew toy, a green monster, tested positive for what the lab categorizes as high levels of lead and chromium. The lab detected lead levels of 907.4 micrograms per kilogram (almost one part per million). Chromium was found at levels of 334.9 micrograms per kilogram. Levels of cadmium, arsenic and mercury were also found in the green monster toy."
Which means that there is less than 1/10000th the amount of lead in these toys as found in common latex paint that we all paint our homes with.
Basically, there is .000009 percent lead found in the toy. I'm sure there is more than that in the water we all drink everyday.
Just my $.02 |
i see what you are saying, but like the food recall... not taking my chances, because that could result in somtehing really bad happening.