View Single Post
Old 09-06-2007, 09:31 AM   #16
MIZBROWN
Donating YT 1000 Club Member
 
MIZBROWN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: California
Posts: 2,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diggy4 View Post
To me its no different than a tatoo....even if the earring is taken out the hole will remain and could be a good identifying tool? Maybe I'm wrong but my tatoos were much more painful than my ear piercing so I dont see it being cruel either. Just my opinion tho. I have thought about it for Bella myself but she rips bows out of her hair and and just does not like anything on her, so I dont think it would work for her but if your baby doesnt seem to mind ear being taped them i would think it would be fine. I would use a ball and much shorter post with flat backing to keep from snagging. they do have earings that have a ball that screws on for a back too like for belly buttons that wouldnt catch on things.
I 100% agree... If there's dog tatoos out there - whats the difference. A dogs ear is no more fragile than that of a newborn baby! Especially when a baby can get peirced as young as 3 mo - Im sure it'd be okay for a pup. A dogs skin is just as durable as humans. Its amazing how fragile some people treat their pups

Never the less, I actually have considered doing this. One cant think of a regular earring, but one that has a special backing and small stud. Also, as with ours, they can be taken out and replaced as well. To each his own!!!
__________________
Mommy to Meka "MeMe" Brown aka Meka the Diva
Member of the Spoiled Rotten Club & CA Yorkies
www.dogster.com/dogs/567943
MIZBROWN is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!