I'm glad she won her lawsuit. She had an excellent reputation, got approached by Mr (using that term loosely) Moore to sell dogs for him, which she does. He sells her sick and dying dogs, which she sells to others. (not necessarily an advocate for brokering) Her customers are holding her responsible, which in turn ruins her reputation, she holds him responsible..... obviously there was plenty of evidence provided in court to support her claim that he sells sick and dying puppies, and the courts award her 126K.
Am I on track with what the story told? I don't get Inside Edition in my area, so I will have to rely on other's to know what they have to say!
I'm sure Mr. Moore and his multiple personalities here will say the testimony is false, and the evidence was doctored or completely fabricated...... just a smear campaign or something! |