Quote:
Originally Posted by dobiedude  Oh yeah I agree. But who knows I would be kinda hesitant because of the way the media has a way of turning things around. As FOX has already said they do not want to see the satisfied owners they only want the upset owners. That is my take on it too. |
I think everyone agrees with you that there are always two sides to a story. However, interviewing the satisfied customers is not going to accomplish anything. I think interviewing Mr. Moore himself would suffice to showing the "other side" of the story.
Think about the situation with your llamas. Let's say this pit bull continuously came back to attack your llamas time and time again - each time killing 1 llama. Say you spoke to the owner of the dog and he said "I wasn't there, I can't do anything" and never restrained his dog. After killing off all your llamas the news comes to do a story. Would you want interviews of neighbors saying "oh the pitbull was such a sweet dog - he would never do anything to harm another animal! dobiedude never should have killed him!"?
There is always going to be a satisfied customer - lots of them. But when the point of the story is the breeding practices and multiple sick/dead dogs with no resolution, the happy customers do not come in to play. What would interviewing a happy customer accomplish? Valbholmes could tell her story of how she received two healthy puppies, but what would that do? It's kind of a null point. Interviewing Mr. Moore would accomplish something. It would let him defend himself and his breeding practices and allow him to explain how many satisfied customers he has. See what I mean?