Thread: Aca
View Single Post
Old 12-04-2006, 02:15 AM   #11
FlDebra
Donating YT 2000 Club Member
 
FlDebra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 7,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaFan121s
Do you think the breeders who sold should take part of the blame for this--for not enforcing the s/n agreement, or making sure that the dog was s/n before leaving, etc etc?
(And BTW, CKC is about to end their open registry period, just FYI. )
I think if there is any thought that there might be health issues that should not be passed on, yes, the breeder should s/n before allowing the puppy to leave. If it is just a matter of the breeder not yet determining if the puppy is of show/breeding quality .... well, then I think the limited registrations are the way to go. That way the owner can always go back to the breeder and ask them to reconsider opening the registrations to full. The breeder would probably decide based on the dog's qualities and the new owner's knowledge, ethics and attitude.

So, I guess I would answer your question with "no" I would not blame the breeder, unless the pup had a physical reason for needing s/n.
__________________
FlDebra and her ABCs
Annie, Ben, Candy
Promoting Healthy Breeding to the AKC Yorkshire Terrier Standard
FlDebra is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!