View Single Post
Old 05-22-2005, 11:28 PM   #30
SoCalyorkiLvr
BANNED!
 
SoCalyorkiLvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julie1
My reason for disliking the term teacup is we are in danger of destroying a hardy terrier breed with this fashion for smaller and smaller dogs.
There does seem to be an inherent perception that the smaller the yorkie, the more health problems. I have not found this to be the case, but maybe others with more experience can elaborate. I do know that the super super tinies like 2 lbs and under are more prone to hypoglycemia which continue throughout their lives and does not end with puppyhood as it does with the larger dogs. I think they also have more open fontanels and there are special precautions necessary for anexthesia. There are the obvious concerns for safety since they are so small but I think those concerns exists for all yorkies. Doors, falling/jumping from high places, being stepped on, being attacked by a larger dog, getting out through holes in fences, drowning, birds of prey, coyotes, etc. are all safety concerns for our babies.

I just wonder how much more of a health concern there is for a below breed standard weight yorkie than one within the standard or if the statisitics exist? I know that they used to allege health issues with the "off colors" which have never been proven and were, in my opinion, simply a rationalization in the past for killing puppies that were not within the breed standard. As far as I am aware chocolate, parti and Biewer yorkies are just as healthy as any other yorkie of traditional color.
SoCalyorkiLvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!