Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Doodlebug I DO NOT think the parents did it. I feel absolutely certain that they DID NOT DO IT. At first I thought like everyone else, that they did it. Then a few years back soneone had a one hour special on it (I think it might have been Dr. Cyril Wecht) and showed all of the things that pointed to an OUTSIDER having done it. After I saw that everything fell into place. All of the unanswered questions in my mind about the parents doing it, seemed to be answered. No way did the parents do it.
I have been recording and watching a lot on night-time shows on it lately. There was a girl in Karr's class that was on Nancy Grace. She had a year book and he signed a lengthy note to her. At the end it said "I SHALL BE THE CONQUERER". They showed the yearbook from 1982 and there it was "I shall be the Conquerer". Then I rewatched the Larry King interview of Mr. & Mrs. Ramsey. They showed the ransom note and it was signed: "Victory...SBTC" (SHALL BE THE CONQUERER!). There it is .... that is what SBTC stands for. Also, it came out in one of the recent shows that Karr's brother worked for the Ramseys and John Karr (the accused, not sure if John is the right first name) was at a Christmas Party at the Ramsey's house. So here is my theory: Karr's brother did it (the one who worked for Mr. Ramsey), hence the reference to $118,000 (or whatever the amount was) in the ransome note. The brother would have known it because he worked for John Ramsey and was resentful to him for having gotten a $118,000 bonus. John Karr is either taking the blame for the brother, or he was there with the brother. WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK??? |
Yes the ransom was for $118,000 but if the parent(s) had nothing to do with it how is it that the mother was said to have wrote the ransom note. Whatever the case may be i hope whoever did this gets caught so that this innocent little girl may rest in peace.