Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RLC12345678 Exactly my point. It is an ENCYCLOPEDIA, which means it is UNBIASED, which makes it even more reliable than the "news" or "media," which is riddled with bias.
You cannot in any way deny that these things that she has done happened. She did them. They were good acts in favor of humanity. You can tell yourself all you want to that she did them for publicity. That is fine. But she did them nontheless and these things that she did are GOOD. So, who in the world cares WHY she did them?!  It is OBVIOUS that she is making the world a better place. How can you argue with that? |
Just read post number #177, it sums it up and I don't want to re-type it
Thank you YTSIRK27, you are right on the money!