Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovetodream88  That’s just not true with reputable breeders. They do let some people breed them but only what they consider other reputable breeders not everyone. If they let everyone then their lines don’t mean that much. Also say you have a person who breeds an outstanding line with one that has terrible genetic issues but advertises how they used the outstanding lines and people buy the pups and they have terrible genetic issues well then the outstanding lines are tarnished and everything that reputable worked for is destroyed. There are other red flags also not just that anyway. Where there is a few red flags there could always be more. I get it’s personal because it’s your breeder. |
No. It’s not personal and it’s not my breeder. I don’t know why you’d say that. Quite frankly that was a rude assumption to make and completely incorrect. I was just mentioning my thoughts on a point you made, and it may be a little bit off topic to the thread but I was just sharing my thoughts about what you said. And of course breeders want to see their life’s work in the gene pools to be properly perpetuated by the breeds caretakers instead of being abused or trashed in the disintegration of their breed. That’s a no brainer. But to say like you did that they won’t share what they have with others, that’s wrong. If you are a person of integrity and ethics and you have a passion for the breed, many reputable breeders will be willing to sell you a dog with breeding rights. You may disagree. And that’s fine. But please avoid making ridiculous assumptions and comments like you did by saying “I get it’s personal because it’s your breeder”. I didn’t even comment on that breeder. I commented on a general statement you made about breeders never selling a dog with breeding rights.