Quote:
Originally Posted by ladyjane  As to the bolded statement in the post above, I can only say this....
Pretty flawed thinking imho. I am willing to pay more for real experts (ie vet nutritionists) and feeding trials, NOT fancy marketing such as the BB law suit has uncovered. I stopped buying a dog food for that reason...they had all the fancy words on their website and the "desired" ingredients, but ignored my requests for names and qualifications of the "experts" they claimed had formulated the diets. Just because a company has the ingredients that guy says are more acceptable does not mean the quality control is there. |
You're far too kind. The bolded statement makes me want to scream and throw my laptop out the window, because he's basically saying that his reviews are meaningless except for figuring out if you're getting value for your money. Then he ends with a plea to consider his star rating--then do your own research. I could have done that in the first place and avoided the middle man (and spared myself a splitting headache).