Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999  I do believe Dr. Remillard article may be helpful for some, I don't see how her article conflicts with this one though. He doesn't say "corn is bad." He believes meat should be first. If you know of any studies that speak of the optimum level or protein for dogs, I would love to read them, but our knowledge of nutrition is evolving and there is a lot of evidence to suggest dogs do well on 30 or more percent protein compared to the 24% found in many dog foods. I'm not sure how Dr. Remillards article helps anyone pick a good dog food, basically she's saying that any dog food that has AFFCO's statement of feeding tests and says it's “complete and balanced nutrition” is a good choice. I think this is a starting place, not an ending place.
I'm kind of confused why you are saying, If people choose to follow opinion rather than the reality of science based, evidenced based clinical trials/outcomes, that is their decision and best of luck with that...." what makes you say this? What in the article makes you think this? |
Nancy, ALL I was doing was responding to the highlighted part above. I cannot for some reason leave out the corn remark; but what I was commenting on was how they were different. He says meat first and she says carbs first three. That was what I meant by conflicting.