 Analysis
For the pet owner layman I believe that the qualitative facts given in the article are useful and alarming. Making all the excuses as to why the data should be rejected seems unfair too me. Is it not rather negative to go to all these lengths to disparage the results? If the DNA were degraded during processing for chicken, why not for pork? I would think that DNA would degrade similarly in most animal meat processing. Perhaps ANYTHING written by this author is by definition suspect and has to be disproven? I find that hard to do, if that is your opinion and advice. |