Quote:
Originally Posted by AllDogBoots  I think there's a difference between "getting it" and "owning your actions". If Taylor can start a thought by saying I'm probably going to get banned for replying but I do feel it's important to defend myself then she's also capable of thinking I'm probably going to upset the OP by replying but I feel it's important to state my opinion. Perhaps someone who has an undiagnosed, but self assumed possible mental illness should slow themselves down a little in the thought/action process.
If a thread was created that was inviting people to read an article about how delicious dogs taste (an outrageous example) I would probably think to myself "that OP is crazy" and not involved myself and click the next thread. Why is the involvement so necessary to those who don't agree with the original post or the article the person posted? |
I thought I might get banned because I continued to post on this thread not any other reason. It's not undiagnosed per say and has been talked about with my doctors I just haven't gone to the right doctor to formally diagnose it but my doctors suspect it as well as my aunt who has a doctorate in childhood development. But I have other issues that have been 100% diagnosed and I am considered by the government to be disabled. I have heard from lots of people that normally you do not get accepted and considered disabled the first time and even with my uncle who was in a wheel chair had lost both legs and most of the fingers on one hand it took him getting a lawyer to prove his disability even further for them to accept it. They excepted mine on the first time. I get where I should have said it differently but that's just how it comes out and that's how most things just come out. It was not making judgements on the poster nor was it to attack the poster just the article that seemed seriously off to me.