Quote:
Originally Posted by 107barney  Not everyone read it as disdainful or insulting to Jenny. I read it as again pointing out that if the test worked, it was random not because it could have a replicable scientific result. When one person keeps promoting a test here that's invalid, I feel like we have to warn others that it's bogus. |
At this point in time we don't know that it is invalid - we do know at least I think we know that it is
*unproven*. So we don't know if it was sheer random luck - that Jenny's dog got well and we certainly don't know if it could or could not have a replicable scientific result.