[Lovetodream88]

Originally Posted by Wylie's Mom

To me, it's not just "the writer's opinion" that matters here, it's the manner in which he expresses it that makes it sounds very immature, angry, emotional, and overly biased to one side. When I read a real opinion article, I prefer the writer to maintain a professional distance to the subject so there can be some objectivity and balance. I don't see any objectivity here at all...mostly just weird/bizarre anger or something. I mean "tendrils of woo", "the furry lovelchild of Deepak Chopra" and "empire of bullsh*t"....really? Not the kind of writer whom I feel maintains an open mind...quite the contrary in fact. It's just plain disrespectful and disdainful as well, and I find that kind of "journalism" highly distrustful.

I think some of it is in a joking tone but I feel that maybe the writer is seriously worried about false info some of these sources are putting out and we have all seen how false info can badly effect dogs. I know when certain false info is said about things I often get angry and can have a hard time keeping my cool.