Quote:
Originally Posted by lisaly  I don't presently have a dog with allergies, but I did in the past. Some people here on YT don't respect Dr. Dodds, and that is their right and opinion. I happen to respect a great deal about what she has done. As for other vets not supporting this test, I'm not surprised because it's not unusual for many vets not supporting anything different from the norm.
Giving this test would not harm any dog, so the only thing that could be hurt is my pocketbook. Had I known of a test like this when my Kiwi was alive, I would have tried it. We tested for environmental allergies, and I gave her shots for them. I tried seeing if some of her allergies could have been food related, but I failed at. I wouldn't have used the results as a definite result, but it could have been used as a starting point. I don't like throwing away money, but it would have been worth it for me. I happen to respect Dr. Dodds. We never did blood tests for food allergies because I know they're not reliable, but if there was a chance that this could have helped my little girl, it would have been worth it to me. She had terrible allergies and colitis, and although she was a happy little girl, they affected her quality of life and health. |
Respectfully, I don't think that vets don't support things because they are "not the norm". While I have not read much about this test, my guess is it just does not have the scientific proof to back it at this point.
People constantly complain about what vets charge. Imagine a vet suggesting someone do a test on a dog and then they find out there is no research to back it? I am not saying that about THIS test....just speaking in general. People don't believe educated folks and yet they believe just about anything they read on the internet.