Quote:
Originally Posted by lisaly  It makes me very sad that we can't do more to protect our little ones without such dangerous implications of such a law. I would do anything in my power to protect my little girl, and her worth to us is priceless. But laws where dogs can be seized without proof of cruelty are too dangerous. I usually analyze things to death, yet I was easily tricked by this law.
I will never forget the story of Leo, a ten year old Bichon who was taken from his mom's arms and thrown into traffic because of a case of road rage. It drew a great deal of attention and the ire of animal lovers everywhere. The man was sentenced to three years in prison, the maximum for animal cruelty in California, but they were recommending probation for him. I wonder what would have happened if this story wasn't as highly publicized. Like most animal lovers, the story of Leo broke my heart. His life mattered, and i wonder how we can protect these innocent animals without dangerous implications. Road Rage Dog Killer Found Guilty - CBS News Road-rage dog tosser sentenced to 3 years / Judge throws book at Leo's killer - SFGate CNN.com - Man gets 3 years for throwing dog in traffic - July 13, 2001 |
People who torture animals, or harm them the way Leo's killer did should be prosecuted and punished much more severely than 3 years. That was deliberate cruelty with a lot of solid proof to back it up. We need to concentrate on putting away creeps like that because if they can treat animals that way, they're a threat to people as well.
There are many laws already on the books to protect animals. They just need to be enforced better, and the witch hunting needs to stop. Adding more laws just bogs down the system and opens the doors to abuse of the people who are trying to live peacefully with their animals.
I can't help noticing the lack of interest in this tread. One way or another, people should be on here spitting mad.