Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovetodream88  Just so you know scientific study's can be flawed. There was a great source I had but when my computer crashed it took it with it. Puppies are still learning up until 12 weeks, they miss out on socialization and learning about bitting by leaving there mom early. Nothing I say or show you is going to change your mind but it is 100% better for the puppies and I do not understand why a breeder would not want to give the puppies the best start possible. It is my experience that when a breeder skips on step that reputable breeders do that they skip more which in the end makes them not reputable and not the best place to get a puppy. |
The fact that some scientific studies can be poor is no reason to reject the scientific method. Another fallacy you are guilty of.
Bite inhibition begins when puppies are younger than 7 weeks and continues beyond 12 weeks. Owners should teach bite inhibition in any case. Guide and Police dogs have bite inhibition. If taking a pup at 7 weeks caused bite inhibition problems it is unlikely the police would ignore this in favour of the other benefits of taking a puppy at this age.
It is fine to claim it is 100% better but you can't produce good quality evidence to back up your claim.
I am destroying your arguments at every step and I am not the one claiming the moral high ground either.
If you can find some decent evidence please offer it up.