Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovetodream88  I'm also an advocate for reputable breeding, animal abuse and so on. There has been nothing to prove the cons of spaying but when they do show up then we I guess will see if I'm letting it blind me. My aunt had a hysterectomy and refused to take the hormones and she did just fine. This thread is going to become a reason for certain people who probably shouldn't have dogs anyway to not spay. It's not safe and the risks are very very real. You would think lovers of this breed and or members of this board who see the opsie breeding all the time would get that it's important but it seems to just be going whoosh over people's heads. This is sad and it makes me very sick to my stomach. |
Then Taylor you have not been reading the research, for certain breeds of dogs, there are very serious risks associated with spaying and neutering at or even earlier than 6 months old. For the Yorkshire Terrier other than one or two studies pointing towards hypothyroidism as an increased risk in s+n males n females, and of course spay incontinence, and one tantalizing research paper that looks at the hormonal impact on proper maturation of ligamentous structures - like the ACL, for female Yorkies at this point in time most pet females IMO should be spayed for their overall health - the key is when? Can we wait a little for growth plate closure and ligamentous tissue maturation? Would that help in the incidence rate of LP and ACL tears, and is decidedly rampant throughout our breed, and as you know is very painfull and also expensive to treat? Would the relatively small increase in Mammary Tumours of which 50% are benign offset the potentiality of reducing LP and ACL tears? Interesting question is it not?
At this early age say 1yr old or so - pyrometra is very very rare, so baring other research that might come out later, we just need to look at mammary increased cancer risk, and also avoiding urinary incontenience, and temperament changes, ACL tears medial luxating patellas as possible benefits to delaying spaying for a bit in time.
The Swedish study did not offer us any elucidation because as opposed to North American studies the bulk of the participants were intact. And god only knows why they only looked at two health problems - that to me is an interesting detail...
The decision you make as a pet owner I would like to see be well informed. Folks who are dedicated enough to slog through this huge thread, and read the research, are searching for informed answers.
The more information we have, the more complex our decisions become, and they should be, when we talk about major surgery, and a major impact into a dogs life.