View Single Post
Old 03-10-2015, 10:21 AM   #399
107barney
T. Bumpkins & Co.
Donating YT Member
 
107barney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 9,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pstinard View Post
Tubal ligation won't affect the rates of mammary tumors and pyometra, because the hormones (mammary tumors) and uterus (pyometra) are left intact. I'm just saying...

I believe that there are birth control injections for dogs--I'm not sure how widely used and accepted they are.

BTW, in answer to a previous comment, no, the chances of mammary tumors and pyometra aren't 100% in unspayed dogs, but do they really need to be? I think that a 20 to 40% risk is quite high enough for me to decide to spay my own dog(s). (Bella has already been spayed.)

If this thread turns into an all-out food fight, please send the ceviche my way .
Cerviche aside (we don't do raw food here).. I am so glad you posted the interpretation of the study. So we have a study that confirms the risk of mammary tumors is greater in unspayed females including Yorkies AND we have real life stories like my friend with her $5,000 in cancer treatments. Her dog had uterine cancer.

There is simply no good reason to leave a pet unspayed.
__________________
Washable Doggie Pee Pads (Save 10% Enter YTSAVE10 at checkout)
Cathy, Teddy, Winston and Baby Clyde...RIP angels Barney and Daisy
107barney is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!