View Single Post
Old 03-10-2015, 09:57 AM   #390
pstinard
YT 3000 Club Member
 
pstinard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Urbana, IL USA
Posts: 3,648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColesMommy01 View Post
I'm an advocate for tubal ligation. Keeps hormones functioning but removes the possibility of being impregnated. Also, I hear they have birth control for dogs, but I can barely get my two to take their hw meds. If the bc is an every day pill like one of the human equivalents it'd be out. Do they have shots like the Depo? Going to look....
Tubal ligation won't affect the rates of mammary tumors and pyometra, because the hormones (mammary tumors) and uterus (pyometra) are left intact. I'm just saying...

I believe that there are birth control injections for dogs--I'm not sure how widely used and accepted they are.

BTW, in answer to a previous comment, no, the chances of mammary tumors and pyometra aren't 100% in unspayed dogs, but do they really need to be? I think that a 20 to 40% risk is quite high enough for me to decide to spay my own dog(s). (Bella has already been spayed.)

If this thread turns into an all-out food fight, please send the ceviche my way .
pstinard is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!