Quote:
Originally Posted by Woogie Man  Wow ..... what a thread.
Legally, I don't have a clue where this thing will go.
What is provable and what is being 'just said'?
The puppy being dropped.
Diane requesting the puppy back.
Answers to the above would have an impact, IMO.
Also, what is 'consistent with liver shunt'? It seems to be an indefinite statement when I would think a liver shunt would be visibly apparent at autopsy. Am I missing something?
This is what jumps out at me at first glance. |
The necropsy report said: “
The gross and histologic findings are consistent with a portosystemic shunt. There was no evidence of a concurrent or infectious disease process within the tissues examined. Such a portosystemic shunt at this early age, combined with poor appetite and insufficient weight gain over weeks as reported in the history, suggests that this is most likely a congenital lesion.”
The medical examiner saw the shunt. It's a big vein jutting out where there should be none.