[gemy]

Yeah here is the whole thing I don't understand, why would anyone agree to go on a National RAdio station and admit to a BS diagnosis? Are they not the least concerned with how their licensing organization such as the CMA or the AMA would look at this?


Do these Docs here in Canada actually think they are immune to censure, if not prosecution? This is not a *cutie* topic, it drives at the most basic of basics the Hippocratic oath.


I am incensed at the very idea of a BS diagnosis, and I don't care if in actuality for that particular person at that particular time, it did no eventual harm to. How does that doc know ... the one who did the BS diagnosis? It does huge harm to the millions upon millions of folks who rely on docs to give them their *honest* opinion, we or at least I trusted docs to do this!!


Very very disturbing to me.