View Single Post
Old 10-30-2014, 01:52 PM   #52
Nancy1999
I ♥ Joey & Ralphie!
Donating Member
 
Nancy1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 25,396
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1975 View Post
I am guessing and ... searching

According to Mr Dalziel's exact words "deduct points for cropped ears and docked tail; also for carriage of the tail over the back." it seems, that at least at the beginning, some dogs were shown undocked, thus the deduction of points for docked tail.
The standard didn't mention the tail that particular time, so it was left in the eyes of the beholder and personal preference.


In the 1878 book "British dogs their varieties, history, characteristics, breeding, management and exhibition by Hugh Dalziel, ("Corsincon")
Mr. Dalziel writes : "tail is usually docked".

https://archive.org/stream/britishdo...e/434/mode/2up

The description of the tail in the standard seems to has been added later, but I don't know exactly when.

In the 1894 book "A history and description of the modern dogs of Great Britain and Ireland - The terriers" written by Rawdon B. Lee there is a standard with the addition of tail.

https://archive.org/stream/moderndog...e/352/mode/2up
It just seems to me if the natural tail were that short, there would have never been a need to dock. I didn't know that they ever cropped ears in a terrier.
__________________
Nancy1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!