Quote:
Originally Posted by SirTeddykins  Hi Nancy,
Biased just refers to the fact that only one side was presented by the CDB which was used to then support their opinion whereas the PetMD link presented pros and cons and then confirmed their support based on all evidence. If that makes sense? It doesn't discredit the CDB's stats, it just weakens their argument because it isn't balanced.
Gemy,
Thanks for the archive link! I do look through archives but I also like to engage in "live" discussion. Firstly, because it is often more interesting for me to be engaged in a discussion rather than read and archive as an outsider. Secondly, new opinions and evidence come to light in addition to new members who may or may not have been able to comment on the original thread - like me!
Anyway, thanks all. Like Gemy, I appreciate a discussion and all sides are equally relevant.
I keep learning which is great! |
Thanks, I thought you meant that the actual study was biased.