I'm saying that the way she reports new is slanted. She tends to write stories that scare the reader. While I believe the report, since it doesn't give us the names of the offending companies, all it does is make us not trust dog food, in general, well all except those independent companies who advertise on her website. Here's another example of her reporting.
The Feather Meal Fluff | Truth about Pet Food She talks about how Royal Canin is using feather as a protein source, but she leaves out the information that they have been testing this for 10 years and it's for dogs who are extremely allergic to most foods and many dogs lives have been saved using this food. She makes it sound like RC is just trying to cut corners and willing to give our dogs crap. She mixes truth with lots of misleading opinions. Seriously, what real facts did we learn from the Chapman report? Some dog food companies mislabel their product. I'm pretty sure I knew that. This to me means, buy from a company that you trust, and one that has it's own processing plant.