View Single Post
Old 07-26-2014, 05:03 PM   #73
Wylie's Mom
Furbutts = LOVE
Donating Member
Moderator
 
Wylie's Mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 35,889
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gemy View Post
I posted the Animal Rights Agenda in an earlier post. Here yet again is their stated goal, vs a vs breeding described in more detail.

Dogs & cats


Item #10 of “Politics of Animal Liberation,” strongly discouraging any further breeding of companion animals, including pedigreed or purebred dogs and cats, had become the policy of most major humane organizations by 1992, when ANIMAL PEOPLE debuted.
What really disturbs me about this and things like this being posted in this thread is that it seems/feels like you're lumping ALL animals rights/welfare people into the same big lump. As if every single one of them is a cookie cutter of the one next to them, as if we are of one mind.

Is that the way the we should also think of breeders? That one breeder is the exact same as a puppy mill breeder and so on? I wonder how the breeders would feel if we lumped them into one sloppy category and started posting things about what "breeders" beliefs are, at large. Do you realize how horrible that would appear, how outrageous? It's no different than how outrageous it is to lump us all together as if we're a bunch paint-throwing animal activists who desire an end to this and that.

Please, I ask that you don't think of me or anyone posting here in that manner bc I'm quite sure we have our own thoughts. This "Item #10" has never been and never will be my goal. It feels like some people are seeing an enemy in places where there is none here.
__________________
~ A friend told me I was delusional. I nearly fell off my unicorn. ~

°¨¨¨°ºOº°¨¨¨° Ann | Pfeiffer | Marcel Verdel Purcell | Wylie | Artie °¨¨¨°ºOº°¨¨¨°
Wylie's Mom is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!