[gemy]

Dr. Becker implies that there is a conspiracy between the American Heartworm Society (AHS), an organization that recommends heartworm prevention for all pets, and the major pharmaceutical companies. In my opinion, this is stretching the truth a bit. Is the AHS sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. Probably. Does that mean that their recommendations are not based in science? No. What it means is that the AHS has examined the issue thoroughly (based on the known science) and made appropriate recommendations to provide adequate protection for your dog. It also means that the pharmaceutical companies have realized that helping the AHS educate veterinarians and pet owners about the fact that this protection is necessary helps sell their products. However, it does not invalidate those recommendations.

Look in science one of the hallmarks of good independent study is to ascertain freedom from bias. That means the researches in appearance and fact, demonstrate that their conclusions are not colored by outside influence.

The fact if indeed it is true that AHS is sponsored by Pharma companies should give one pause for thought. An independent body, should be an independent body, pure and simple.

One would need to look at the structure and protocols on how the AHS reviews scientific literature to make their informed opinions. Similar to Cochrane reviewed studies. If that is not present then..... I would not validate them as an independent authorative body on anything.

Having said all this, which is merely a rebuttal to the bolded statements above, I too believe that heartworm preventative is important. I abide by the CVMA recommendations and will continue to do so, until and unto such time there is a preponderance of evidence that suggests otherwise.