[jp4m2]

[Qute] "There you go again saying things like people have false beliefs. I know you think everyone but you is stupid and just need enlightening and that veterinarians have no good sense of reactions. But honestly vets aren't the imbeciles you make them out to be. The reason people don't report reactions is because they don't occur at the alarming rate that you claim they do. Any dog having a reaction should see a vet. Any dog with a problem should see a vet, and IMO, not a holistic one. I have a seizure dog and it galls me to no end when people claim he might have gotten it from vaccines or diets or any other of the conjecture conspiracy theories put forth by the holistic machine. Lol. I am vaccinating my dogs and there are living into ripe old age regardless." [Quote]


You have been on this board long enough to know other members are allowed to voice their opinions even though it may differ from another members opinion. Just because I voice another point of view is no reason to insult or degrade my posts.

I'll clarify for you as to my reference as to why most vets don't recognize vaccine reactions, especially if it's a delayed reaction, is based on Dr. Schultz's studies. This is not coming from my opinion, this information is coming from Dr. Schultz, who has spoken often about this subject. I didn't just pull this out of the blue, Dr. Schultz is a world renowned researcher so I think he may know a little more about this than you do. It might be to your befit to read some of his work to familiarize yourself with his findings. I think he may know a thing or two in this area.

I see what you tried to do here.... This is not a holistic issue it's an issue about vaccines and how to do them it a safe way for our pets to be protected without adding unnecessary risks by administering unneeded vaccines. The Op posted about underreported reactions and I was agreeing with this issue. I never said not to vaccine, so I don't know why this is brought up concerning my post???