Quote:
Originally Posted by gemy  You know TAylor it is Not about making excuses for owners, it is simply not commenting on what a bloody well bad owner they were for allowing their dog to be in this condition or that. And quite frankly you don't know just exactly how they qualified as a bad owner. By whose standards, are there not any exceptions?
The article is food for thought, even if that thought is uncomfortable and portrays a view point different to the main. |
When you keep a dog or dogs in cages where there is no food, no water no human contact and freezing to death you deserve to be called out and even charged with animal cruelty, when you beat and abuse a dog you deserve to be called out and charged, when you fight one dog with another you deserve to be called out and so on. When you turn your dog over to a rescue because you can not afforded that care for the dog you deserve a pat on the back because you just showed the ultimate sign of love. Abusing an animal is the same as a busing a human or stealing and so on and you deserve to be called out and do your time for the wrong you did because it is against the law. If we don't call these people out and show others how it's wrong and that there are actual consequences then people will keep doing it and that's not fair to the dogs. The unconditional love these dogs can give and the loyalty they give they deserve for the future to look brighter for them they deserve it. We have to stop people from doing it not give them a reason to do it.