Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximo  Right, the original transaction was never completed because the company failed to deliver the goods. The bogus fine was for "disparaging" the company's reputation (by leaving a legitimate review), which was against the company's terms.
The couple said this was not part of the terms when they made the purchase. Even if it was in there, that is ridiculous. I don't see how this would stand up to any law or consumer protection thingies. |
But the terms only apply if and when there is a valid contract or transaction. Since the transaction was voided by the company, their terms of agreement can't apply because there was no agreement. Wasn't the agreement voided by the company when they returned the money?