View Single Post
Old 02-15-2006, 08:47 PM   #34
whispersmom2
Inactive Account
 
whispersmom2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 2,985
Default

There certainly a few vets who do not advise altering a pet that is not being used for breeding. However, in my 40+ years of dealing with vets, I have not met even ONE!. I have however, met males who have had testicular cancer and females who have had breast, ovarian and uterine cancer. I personally cannot see a valid reason for taking a chance with my dogs' lives and leaving those organs that are know to heighten their cancer risk. Believe me, humans are also beginning to think along the same lines. I am totally happy that I have had a hys..no worry about uterine or cervical cancer. BUT, ovaries were left and now we are testing to eliminate ovarian cancer. Now, how happy would I be had they been removed 35 years ago? Then, I could only worry about brain cancer, bone, blood, lung, GI and so on.
I do not mean to stray off topic but these seem to add a dimension to this discussion..
whispersmom2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!