View Single Post
Old 07-10-2013, 02:09 AM   #23
YorkOfTheShire
BANNED!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 383
Default

The open fontanel (spelling?) was noted, yes - but they said not to worry because she had no water on the brain (still doesn't). The reason it's a new factor in the equation is because an open fontanel by itself isn't all that rare, but when it's accompanied by short legs, lack of incisors and a stunted appearance it can be an indicator of other things - such as dwarfism that he was referring to.

Right now it's a "wait and see". He did not say she has dwarfism or that he believed she did - he said she *could*, due to the factors involved. So it's sit and wait.

I'm choosing to believe (for now) that she's simply younger than what she was assessed at. He said it was a possibility also, but he kinda had a wrinkled nose when he said it. I still choose to believe that until proven otherwise.
YorkOfTheShire is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!