05-27-2013, 09:32 AM
|
#118 |
YT 2000 Club Donating Member
Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Huntsville,Ont,Canaada
Posts: 12,340
| Quote:
Originally Posted by McheleM Just because the breeder has DNA testing done, doesn't prove she didn't know her dogs were mixed breeds (if that's how it comes out). She could have knowingly purchased mixed breed dogs with falsified papers with the intent of breeding them and further duping unsuspecting buyers. Of course, now that she's caught, shes going to cry foul to try and make herself look better.
It's obvious no research was done, as she purchased dogs that were registered ACA, she bred them, not knowing what she was doing, and then sold the pups at an early age with a bogus registry. Even if whoever sold her the dogs was not honest with her, the responsibility still lies with her. She chose to breed those dogs, without knowledge and research. She just accepted someone's word and didn't verify facts. She is just as guilty as her supposed breeder. |    And for that reason it is her responsibility to make reparation vs a vs Minnie
__________________ Razzle and Dara. Our clan. RIP Karma Dec 24th 2004-July 14 2013 RIP Zoey Jun9 th 2008-May 12 2012. RIP Magic,Mar 26 2006July 1st 2018 |
| |