View Single Post
Old 05-27-2013, 06:56 AM   #111
McheleM
Donating YT 2000 Club Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Mesquite, TX
Posts: 2,659
Default

Just because the breeder has DNA testing done, doesn't prove she didn't know her dogs were mixed breeds (if that's how it comes out). She could have knowingly purchased mixed breed dogs with falsified papers with the intent of breeding them and further duping unsuspecting buyers. Of course, now that she's caught, shes going to cry foul to try and make herself look better.

It's obvious no research was done, as she purchased dogs that were registered ACA, she bred them, not knowing what she was doing, and then sold the pups at an early age with a bogus registry. Even if whoever sold her the dogs was not honest with her, the responsibility still lies with her. She chose to breed those dogs, without knowledge and research. She just accepted someone's word and didn't verify facts. She is just as guilty as her supposed breeder.
__________________
"You've never learned to live until you've done something for someone for which they can never repay you."~Ralph Hall.
McheleM is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!