One of the Casey Anthony jurors said that the reason, they found her not guilty of everything, is that the prosecutor never gave them a clear picture of what actually happened, never mind that this isn’t necessary legally, she just wasn’t satisfied she could convict someone without a clear picture in her mind. The reporter tried to argue with her, but she was steadfast in her belief in “reasonable doubt” and this foggy view of exactly what happened led to not guilty verdict. This is one of the things that bother me in this trial. Do you all feel like you have a clear idea on how she did it? Here’s a timeline of photos, at one point when Detective Flores was interviewing her and showed her the photos, she said Travis would never allow anyone to take a photo of him like that. Do you think she used the gun to get him in a vulnerable position? Sometimes, I think she brought the gun and it jammed, this is also what she said in the Ninja story that the gun jammed. They say liars weave truth with fiction.
Anyway, I really wish I could have a clear picture of the sequence of events. I do believe something happened that Jodi didn't plan for; maybe the stab wounds that she thought would kill him didn't incapacitate him as much as she thought they would, and he really did fight back with her more than she thought he would. Any opinions on this?