Quote:
Originally Posted by Islandloverr   OMG! I just submitted a long response to all of your questions and it freaking disappeared (excuse my language). But let's try this again...
I don't know how to put multiple quotes in my response so i'm just going to respond by name.
@Carmeow... I just seen the link that Ownedbyjezebel posted and that wasn't the site that I went to. It was just an article that screetshotted some of the pictures so maybe that's why I didn't see the disclaimer. Sorry for the confusion. 
@Yorkietalkjilly....I never said that It was staged or that I actually believed this specific event was staged. I was just saying how some of the details that were being reported sounded a little fishy to me. And how I'm not so quick to believe everything that I'm told. Now to rightfully answer your question...I'm sorry to say that I can't. I'm the wrong girl to ask. I'm nothing more than an ordinary slightly paranoid person. 
@Ownedbyjezebel...Well no one specifically wrote that. It was something I took out of someones post, (and maybe I was wrong) but I FELT that they were implying that. It was something along the lines of "it being disturbing how the mother was suspicious and being hostile to America and it's justice". So thats where my response came from. But I feel what's so disturbing about someone not trusting America? There are many Americans who don't trust America. Hasn't America (or whoever make decisions on the behalf of America) displayed questionable and secretive actions before? so what's so disturbing about a mother not trusting them? BUT!!! If I read it the wrong way and took that post out of context I apologize in advance. |
I don't recall indicating you or who said it was staged - I was just addressing a small part of the enormity of that concept as well as asking why a huge host of people would risk everything to conspire to stage this event and all for the purpose of fingering (an) innocent person or persons.
As to paranoia or wondering about the news reports to date, no one is claiming facts in court yet. Media is merely reporting on what law enforcement and bystanders and victims have reported to them from things they have seen, discovered or experienced. To date, a single bombing suspect has been charged. No Grand Jury has met or anything, no indictment brought and no decisions on the type of penalty to be sought have been made. Later on, once an indictment is made, the police and federal investigations are all complete, then the prosecution will start to put the facts together and see if they can prove a case against the indicted person(s) and decide on the type of penalty they will seek. Down the road a trial will take place unless there is a plea. During that trial, the defense will refute the prosecution's case with any contradictory facts, witnesses and information they have from their investigation and discovery. In federal court, a jury(or a judge in a bench trial) will decide on whether the defendant(s) is/are guilty and if so, the sentence will be rendered by the judge or jury, depending upon the type of the federal case. That is our judicial system. It isn't perfect by far because it is made up of humans but it works better than most I've read about or heard of.
Still, to me, the information coming out in the media to this point and the persons it is pointing to is by far easier to believe than some of the other theories I have read on the internet!