[yorkietalkjilly]

Nancy, I haven't really paid any attention to the trial until last week and I wondered about the gun myself. I haven't heard any testimony of whose it was or where it is or the bullet(s) or anything. All I heard in my bit of listening last week was that her grandparents' gun was stolen very shortly B4 the murder. I didn't hear about the camping gun until now. Whose knife was it and all that, IDK either. On those talk shows at night, I've never seen them talk about much but the sex! They take every opportunity to broadcast that.

I know this - she was so dumb she couldn't even begin to plan or carry out a murder without leaving herself all over it!!! And then dumb enough to talk to police without any attorney, TV interviewers and anyone else in line to listen! She's one of the dumbest chicks I've ever seen on the planet and she's ruined that man's life, obviously, his family's and her own. And all for what? What did she gain by killing him? All she had to do was move on when he lost interest and she was home free. She's fairly articulate and could have maybe developed into someone useful had she chosen a better path with some purpose and been a lot less caught up in her "relationships".

I think the jurors questions aren't that helpful in that she gets them ahead of time and there will be no gotcha moments that way - she'll just say she doesn't remember because it was "too horrible". It's just wasting time and giving her more face time with them - not productive as far as I can tell.