Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BamaFan121s Again, you state this things and claim they are facts. What makes them facts? Because a particular vet or group of vets says it is so? Because this was the result of a study? What about the vets and studies that show the opposite? Why should they be discredited?
There are vets, sources, links, studies that all show exactly the opposite of what this individual claims. Plus, some of these you have stated have yet to be explained, as I have already pointed out twice. How can anyone consider something a factor if they have NO clue what it means? |
Again...show me the studies which refute these findings. All of the studies posted so far confirm them ...they are just given much weight by the vets and breeders in making their decision to ESN because they place more value on the pet over population problem and the need to protect their lines.
These FACTS are not important to them in other words. This is my main point.
If there is true controversy and some of these things are unproven, as in the area of over-vaccination, I feel they should still be KNOWN so that everyone has the right to operate from a level playing field with nothing hidden, glossed over or misrepresented.
The only reason anyone can give for non-disclosure of these things is that they are afraid it may cause some to act irresponsibly.......It is not our job to contol people....but to give them the facts and trust them to make the decision that is right for them.