Quote:
Originally Posted by Buddylove86  I am sorry but this research was done as a master thesis. It means it was not done by phds or dvms. It was not done at any of the veterinary schools. It was not from a credible source such as the JAVMA (Journal of the AVMA). If all of these things were true it would have been a major topic at the AVMA convention in San Diego last month. |
Great points, I didn't even notice that, as I stated before, one study doesn't really prove anything, it may just prove that the study was designed wrong, or the results were a statistical fluke. Already people seem to be taking it as proof neutering is bad, not just early vs. late, but neutering in general. If it has any valid points it will be printed in a reputable journal, where they will discuss it and replicate it.